Inventory credit for intent and RFQ market makers. Liquorice lets market makers borrow from a shared capital pool just-in-time when they win a solver auction, instead of locking capital across wallets — making intent and RFQ market making more capital-efficient.
Velocity of growth — engagement quality folded in at 35%
Ranked by a composite of views, reach per follower, likes and bookmarks — normalised against this account's own peak.
Proud to say it's official - we're part of EASY Residency Season 4 by @YZiLabs. The past 10 weeks have been spent building alongside an incredible cohort in Bhutan, pushing Liquorice closer to a more capital-efficient m…
Crypto talks about liquidity. Professionals talk about capital efficiency. Not the same conversation. https://t.co/ON9CsSMGMD
We presented Liquorice today at EASY Residency S4 Demo Day with @YZiLabs. 🎙 On stage we got into why onchain market making is still so capital-intensive, how Liquorice solves that by providing credit right at settlemen…
Tokenized stocks are the visible 10% of the story. The other 90% is a full financial stack getting rebuilt underneath them. Here's the map, layer by layer. https://t.co/e0uOHFfGoT
1/ Market makers end up parking a ton of capital across different venues just to stay ready to trade. Liquorice gives them credit at settlement instead, so they can run with less idle inventory and put that capital where…
Latest activity from @LiquoriceHQ.
Tokenization means rebuilding the whole market underneath the asset: issuance, settlement, execution, market making, capital. Liquorice owns one piece of that map: making fragmented liquidity usable as onchain markets grow. https://t.co/zpQUmnbWjC
This is why infrastructure keeps pulling in serious teams. As tokenized assets scale, issuers share the prize with whoever builds the plumbing nobody sees.
Shared inventory is the countermeasure. One pool backs many execution environments at once, so capital efficiency rises without sacrificing market quality. This is the layer where fragmentation gets paid down.
As venues multiply, the same inventory gets stretched across more ecosystems at once. Past a certain point, capital requirements grow faster than the liquidity they produce. That's the failure mode to avoid.
Market makers are where the economics live. Every tokenized stock, ETF, RWA, and stablecoin pair is a market that needs quoting, and quoting means committed capital. Nobody quotes for free.
Then execution. Liquidity will not sit on one exchange. It'll scatter across DEXs, intent protocols, wallets, aggregators. Best execution becomes an infrastructure problem, not a feature bolted onto a trading app.
Settlement next. It sounds dull until you remember TradFi spent five decades grinding on clearing, because everything else sits on top of it. Onchain assets inherit the same problem with different tooling.
Issuers first. Ondo, Backed, and Superstate build the rails that bring traditional assets onchain. No issuance, no market. But issuance is the starting line of this race, not the finish.
The pitch compresses to "stocks → blockchain." The real chain: issuers → custody → settlement → liquidity → market makers → routing → execution → users. Every layer has to be rebuilt, not just the asset on top.
Tokenized stocks are the visible 10% of the story. The other 90% is a full financial stack getting rebuilt underneath them. Here's the map, layer by layer. https://t.co/e0uOHFfGoT